Nowadays data displays are found all over the internet but
as Edward Tefte mentions in chapter one of "The Visual Display of Quantitative Information", these do not catch the attention of the viewer
just because they look “pretty”; rather, they are designed in a way that the
data they contain is appealing and effective. From this aspect the viewer is
engaged with the story that a graph might be telling.
A good Tufte draws is that one should be careful when using ranges
since some of them might not actually make sense with others, just like the
example he showed!
Anyways, the chapter presents data maps, time-series plots,
space-time narratives and relational graphics. It was interesting to see the different styles that were applied for each type, even though they were categorized as the same graphic, at the same time you could differentiate one from another. So I guess it is here when we come in, and think about how the style we apply to a graphic can change its effect.
One of the points that I got from the reading was that not all of these different types apply to all the data sets. Census and those who concern the population in a country will cause more effect in a map than in a time-series, or some other sort since, like Tifte mentions, one can come up with different questions about the data plot over the map. Questions like, why is this section of the country more affected than some other, etc.
The graphic type that I found would cause more effect on viewers if having data sets that contain a connection with each other is the relational graphic! Through it one might be able to see the reasons of the increase of values in one data set by the information of the other one.
One of the points that I got from the reading was that not all of these different types apply to all the data sets. Census and those who concern the population in a country will cause more effect in a map than in a time-series, or some other sort since, like Tifte mentions, one can come up with different questions about the data plot over the map. Questions like, why is this section of the country more affected than some other, etc.
The graphic type that I found would cause more effect on viewers if having data sets that contain a connection with each other is the relational graphic! Through it one might be able to see the reasons of the increase of values in one data set by the information of the other one.
Every representation has the capability to
tell a story, as Tifte seems to prove. Although those graphics types that contain more optical detail might cause more effect on the user. Nevertheless each graphics type is able to tell a story! One just needs to consider which one would cause a better representation of our data set!